Move the sliders, pick your tax regime (new or old, FY 2026-27), and see exactly how much more wealth SIF preserves vs PMS and AIF Cat-III on your specific corpus and return assumption. Most investors are shocked by the gap.
Adjust to your situation. Results update live.
The four wrappers carry materially different tax and cost structures. Here is exactly how each post-tax CAGR is computed:
The formula assumes a single hold-and-exit at the end of the period. Real portfolios churn β which makes the wrapper differential more pronounced for slab-rate vehicles, not less. Calculator output is illustrative; actual outcomes depend on fund-specific cost, churn, sequence of returns, and individual tax circumstances.
India's new tax regime is the default since FY 2023-24, and most HNIs are now on it. The single difference that matters for this calculator is the surcharge cap: under the new regime the maximum surcharge is 25%, so the top marginal rate is 39% (30% Γ 1.25 Γ 1.04 cess). The old regime retains a 37% surcharge band above βΉ5 crore of income, taking the top rate to 42.74%. Toggle the regime above to apply the correct effective rate to the slab-taxed vehicles (PMS, AIF Cat-III); SIF and MF are 12.5% LTCG regardless of regime.
SIFs inherit Section 10(23D) fund-level tax exemption β gains compound untaxed inside the fund and are only taxed at investor-level redemption at LTCG rates. PMS gains are pass-through at slab. AIF Cat-III is taxed at the fund level at slab plus surcharge. Over a 10-year hold for a top-bracket investor, that single regulatory difference can compound to roughly βΉ70β80 lakh per crore of allocation β the exact figure depends on your regime, bracket and the funds chosen. This is an illustrative model, not a forecast.